Any investor, worrying about his/her deposits, monitors the situation in the project and analyzes what is happening. This is certainly the right decision, the problem is in the conclusions which can be true or not. A very common situation is when an anxious investor finds an “efficient” service on the Internet, inserts all the data there, the service does the analysis allegedly and voila, the investor gets some kind of statistics with which he/she draws erroneous conclusions.

The first misconception of an ordinary investor - all the HYIP bloggers are invested in a particular project[ i]. No. They all live at the expense of listing.

Most often bloggers collaborate only with projects that have feedback, when you can talk with the administrator, look at the plans and statistics to make at least some conclusions on future work. Moreover, the fame of the administrator does not guarantee the success of future projects, so only the seer will accurately predict when and what will happen with the next HYIP.

The second misconception is to call [i]the presence of a large number of monitors, which confuse most investors who watch for the situation. The bottom line is that not only a reliable project may be there, but large number of monitors can also keep "partisans". In order to not make a mistake you should monitor not only the number of monitors, but also the size of the deposit per each of them, as well as the place of the HYIP in the rating. If HYIP has the thirtieth, fiftyth or hundredth place, then the project will not be very popular. If no one sees the project, then there are no views, because investors are unaware of its existence. Therefore, it is not worth to draw conclusions basing only on the number of monitors that the administrator has invested a lot of money and the project will advance.

There are also some fun programs which are claimed to collect information from all monitors and calculate how many people came in from it. Well, you should not even talk about how easy it is to fake such statistics.

So, if the project is on a large number of monitors but is actually in the end of the table, you should consider that it does not exist in nature and no one will invest in it and therefore there will be no profit.

The third misconception concerns the duration of the projects. There is an erroneous opinion that if the plan is long-term, it means the scam will be soon or if the project has been working for a long time, it is usually reliable. First of all, you need to watch and track the time when the project appears on significant blogs and forums, as the monitors, as noted earlier, are uninformative.

Previously the Alexa service was popular because it provided graphics with the degree of project popularity relative to other projects. It was possible to rely on it in terms of extracting information about the success or failure of the project at one or another stage. Now the charts do not show the real state of things, therefore we recommend leaving this service and not focusing on its statistics. One of the most reliable graphs therу now is the graph of users' geography.

The fourth misconception - statistics which are provided by the project itself is reliable. No. It is obviously clear that everyone works according to the principle “if you don't blow your own horn, no one will do it for you ” Do not try to build tables and graphs according to the data from the HYIP, because ou will not get knowledge of the current situation. At least, you will not see objective data here for sure.

If at the start of the project you can believe what the administrator offers as statistics, then the further some fake deposits may arise on monitors and you should not believe it. You can track the data on the indicators based on any reliable blog, but remember that there also data sometimes may lie.

The fifth misconception which concerns investors-"hackers", who can easily track anyone's IP. Well, each HYIP is protected by DDoS protection, which means simple truth - it is impossible to know the project IP. Of course, sometimes you can define projects that have already burnt, but certainly not by IP. To do this you need to analyze and compare huge amount of information, the finding of an unreliable project by IP is ineffective.

And the last misconception for today concerns contests and various interesting applications - if something like this happens, scam may be soon. Yes, if contests and promises of Eldorado come from the administrator, more often it promises nothing good. If this happens within the blog, most likely, this is simply an initiative of the blog administration, which seeks to develop it and attract a new audience, so there is no need to be scared.

Be attentive investors and be smart with everything so as not to miss your profit.