Robinhood Chain’s explosive first two weeks have revived a familiar question. Is Ethereum dead, or did a brokerage serving nearly 28 million customers just deliver the strongest argument yet that it is quietly winning?

The layer-2 launched on July 1, built with Arbitrum technology and using ether (ETH) as its native gas token. Ethereum finalizes its transactions and stores its records, yet analysts disagree sharply over who captures the value.

Why Robinhood Chain Strengthens the Ethereum Bull Case

Travis Kling, founder of Ikigai Asset Management, asked this week whether real companies have any interest in existing L1s and L2s. He pointed to Robinhood, SWIFT, Stripe, and Wall Street’s Canton as evidence they prefer their own blockchains.

However, Robinhood’s architecture cuts against that premise. Robinhood Chain is an Ethereum layer-2, a separate network that inherits Ethereum’s security.

Final settlement happens on Ethereum, meaning the main network holds the definitive record of its transactions. Its official bridge needs no third-party validators, and ETH is the native gas token.

In other words, Robinhood did not reject Ethereum. It rejected sharing a chain with other projects, then chose Ethereum as the parent network for its own.

The chain also caps a deliberate two-step strategy. Robinhood launched its first-generation Stock Tokens on Arbitrum One in June 2025, tested demand on shared infrastructure for a year, then graduated to its own chain.

Its public testnet processed more than 200 million transactions before mainnet, per the Arbitrum Foundation.

The commercial logic mirrors Coinbase’s decision to build Base as an Ethereum layer-2 in 2023. Both firms wanted control, custom features, and predictable economics without bootstrapping a new validator set, bridge, and liquidity base from scratch.

Notably, neither firm launched a proprietary gas token. ETH already pays for layer-1 services, carries deep liquidity, and avoids the legal and distribution questions a new token would raise.

The product case is concrete. Robinhood says Stock Tokens now trade 24/7 through its wallet in more than 120 countries, with a dedicated Uniswap venue live from day one. The Arbitrum Foundation puts the chain’s latency at 100 milliseconds. Those specifications required a dedicated chain, but never a new layer-1.

Early traction supports the choice. Within two weeks, the network passed Ethereum in volume across decentralized exchanges (DEX), ranking third overall at roughly $811 million daily.

Meanwhile, World’s prediction market teased leaving Solana to redeploy on Robinhood Chain. While it remains unclear whether they moved, the prediction market acknowledges the network has motion.

In the same tone, trader Borovik argued the launch is bullish because anyone launching an L2 still needs ETH for gas.

Analyst Miles Deutscher, meanwhile, said he is already deploying capital into projects on the new chain.

“I’m personally throwing a few darts and DCAing into some top projects on the Robinhood chain (not necessarily high-conviction, but want to capture upside if this momentum continues),” Deutscher stated.

Want more insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Newsletter here.

The Bear Case Says Ethereum Sells Security Too Cheap

Lorenzo Valente, a researcher at Ark Invest, published the numbers behind the discomfort in a post on X (Twitter).

“Since inception, Robinhood Chain has grossed ~$816K in revenue. Arbitrum, the middleware provider, takes 10%: ~$80K. Arbitrum then pays Ethereum for settlement: $1,538,” noted Lorenzo Valente, researcher at Ark Invest.

By his math, Robinhood keeps 89% of gross revenue, Arbitrum takes 10%, and Ethereum collects 0.15%. Valente argues a healthier split would route around 15% to Ethereum, because the deal was won on merit but priced poorly.

The split is not an accident of code. Arbitrum’s Expansion Program licence charges chains on its stack 10% of net revenue, with 8% routed to the ArbitrumDAO treasury and 2% to its developer guild.

Ethereum, by contrast, charges no such fee. Its Dencun upgrade in March 2024 deliberately cut the cost layer-2s pay to post data, so the $1,538 bill is Ethereum’s own pricing working as designed.

“When I was working on HTTP, I used to say, “there’s no money in protocols”. Then crypto seemed to prove that wasn’t entirely true. But as the real applications emerge on chain, we realize it is in fact true. … The money has always been in the application, not the protocol,” BitGo CEO Mike Belshe noted, drawing a sharper conclusion from the same case.

Investor Fiskantes went further, calling the split an identity crisis born of five years of underperformance.

In his view, Ethereum tried to be everything for everyone and now struggles to capture business value and function as money at the same time.

What the Debate Means for ETH

The market backdrop explains the anxiety. ETH trades near $1,795, down roughly 41% over the past year, with a $216.7 billion market cap that still ranks second among all crypto assets.

The bull reading treats ETH as money rather than equity. On this view, every new corporate chain that adopts ETH for gas and collateral deepens its monetary role, however thin settlement fees remain. Fee income was never the thesis.

The bear reading treats ETH as a claim on cash flows. From that angle, a 0.15% revenue share from Ethereum’s most important new customer is a warning, not a victory, and the discount has no obvious expiry date.

Still, the death question and the valuation question are not the same. Whatever the revenue split, a brokerage with nearly 28 million customers just bet its flagship on-chain product on Ethereum’s stack. That is the opposite of a death signal.

Both camps agree on one point. Robinhood picked the Ethereum stack on merit, and traders weighing Ethereum’s July 2026 outlook now have a cleaner test than ever.

The open question is whether Ethereum reprices the settlement layer it sells, or keeps offering it at marginal cost while applications collect the margin.

Источник: BeInCrypto