The crypto industry today is almost unrecognizable from 7 years ago, both in size and scale. Just for decentralized exchanges (DEX), trading volume grew roughly 9,260x from 2019 to a record $4.7 trillion in 2025.  In 2026, however, activity moderated to $1.63 trillion year-to-date. 

It’s not down to one chain or sector. Liquidity is now distributed across more blockchains, venue types, protocols, and execution environments, without one clearly replacing the others.

SwapSpace recently published its State of Crypto Swaps 2026 report, which shows the massive extent of this growth. One of the clearest findings comes from its own platform data. Over 90.12% of its users interacted with more than one blockchain network in 2026. 

At the same time, survey respondents did not identify DEXs, CEXs, or aggregators as universally offering the best rates.

The findings clearly show that the market today offers more execution options, and no single venue, network, or liquidity source dominates every transaction. 

90% of SwapSpace Users Are Multichain

SwapSpace is a crypto exchange aggregator that lets users compare rates across different swap services and exchange different crypto through a single interface. So, the platform has a notable vantage point of how users today interact across different chains.

Among SwapSpace users, multichain activity is not marginal. Between 2022 and 2026, the share of users interacting with more than one network ranged from 72.50% to 93.66%. 

It reached its lowest point at 72.50% in 2024, before rising to 90.12% in 2026. Even at the low point of the observed period, nearly three-quarters of users interacted with more than one blockchain.

These figures provide a platform-level view of how users operate in a market where assets and liquidity are spread across multiple networks.

The broader DEX market shows a similar redistribution of activity. According to DeFiLlama data cited in the SwapSpace report, Ethereum accounted for 46.2% of global DEX volume in 2021, while BNB Chain represented another 39.6%.

By 2025, Ethereum’s share was 19.3% and BNB Chain’s 15.3%, while Solana accounted for 33.3% and other chains collectively represented 32.1%. 

SwapSpace’s internal activity data shows a similar lack of a permanent leader. Ethereum led platform activity from 2020 through 2024, Solana moved into first place in 2025, and BNB Chain led in 2026. 

Taken together, the data shows that multichain activity is taking place in a market where liquidity leadership continues to shift between ecosystems. 

Fragmentation Does Not Stop at the Blockchain Level

The multichain picture captures only one layer of fragmentation. Liquidity is also distributed within individual blockchain ecosystems. The report cites DeFiLlama tracking of around 1,950 protocols on Ethereum, more than 1,200 on BNB Chain, and more than 1,000 each on Arbitrum and Base.

Those protocols can contain different pools, assets, and execution mechanisms. A user operating on Ethereum, for example, is not necessarily accessing one unified liquidity environment.

That creates two layers of complexity: liquidity is distributed between blockchain ecosystems and again between protocols and pools within them.

The distinction matters because the number of possible execution paths can expand even without adding another network. A transaction may involve not only choosing a chain, but also navigating several potential sources of liquidity within that chain.

In that sense, describing the market as simply “multichain” understates how fragmented the execution layer itself has become.

DEX Growth Has Produced a Hybrid Market

DEX trading has grown sharply, but it has not replaced centralized exchanges.

After reaching a record $4.7 trillion in 2025, DEX activity remains significant in 2026, even as the broader crypto market has cooled. Centralized exchanges still handle most spot trading, while DEXs are gaining ground in areas such as perpetual futures.

The result is a more hybrid market. Traders now move between centralized and decentralized venues depending on liquidity, asset availability, transaction size, and market conditions. Crypto trading is becoming more fragmented rather than shifting toward one dominant model.

Best Rate Still Matters — But It Is Not the Only Variable

Price remains central to how users evaluate swaps. Based on the report’s latent class analysis, SwapSpace estimates that 61.86% of survey respondents valued best rate, compared with 52.51% for multichain access and 39.91% for support for rare tokens.

The differences become clearer across user segments. Among crypto-native power users, 97% valued multichain access, 91% best rate, and 87% rare-token support. Traders and business users placed the greatest emphasis on best rate at 88%, while 61% valued multichain access and 52% rare-token support. Mainstream generalists were more balanced, with 76% valuing both best rate and multichain access.

The figures suggest that price remains important, but users can evaluate a transaction through several variables at once. The quoted rate may matter alongside access to a particular network or asset.

The same ambiguity appears when respondents are asked which venue type offers the best rates in their experience. Answers were distributed across DEXs, CEXs, aggregators, and “depends on the situation,” with no single category emerging as an overwhelming choice.

SwapSpace’s provider data adds another layer of context. Among users who completed at least two exchanges, 70% selected a different liquidity provider for their next transaction, while 30% returned to the same one.

The findings suggest that “best” can be transaction-specific rather than a permanent property of one venue or provider.

Swaps are Serving More Than Trading

The survey also shows that crypto swaps take place in different contexts.

Receiving funds and personal payments were the most common reported crypto use cases among respondents, followed by short-term and long-term trading, while business payments ranked lower.

When respondents were asked which additional platform capabilities they valued, payments for goods and services ranked highest, followed by cashback and automatic swaps. Fiat withdrawal, Telegram functionality, and lending and borrowing ranked lower.

Transaction triggers were similarly varied. Sudden price movements and portfolio rebalancing were the leading triggers for swaps, while news and emergency needs also appeared and influencer signals ranked last.

These findings mean that the same exchange infrastructure can support different objectives, from responding to price movements and managing a portfolio to receiving funds or making payments.

That also means execution requirements are not necessarily identical across transactions. A trader reacting to a sudden market move may prioritize different conditions from someone exchanging assets as part of a payment.

Intent-Based Execution Moves Complexity Behind the Interface

One emerging response to this fragmented environment is intent-based execution.

Instead of choosing an exchange, blockchain, or trading route, users simply state what they want to achieve. Competing systems then find a way to complete the trade.

Platforms such as UniswapX, 1inch Fusion, and NEAR Intents already use versions of this model. As crypto liquidity spreads across more venues and networks, this approach could make trading easier by moving routing decisions into the background.

The market can stay fragmented while the user experience becomes much simpler. But that means more of the complexity has to be handled behind the scenes. 

How platforms handle that complexity may differ. Intent-based execution is one approach, but not the only one. Ultimately, what matters is whether users can access the networks and liquidity they need without having to navigate the underlying complexity themselves. 

Source: BeInCrypto